Dysphagia rehabilitation in post-COVID patients: Review of the literature

COVID-19 causes acute respiratory failure syndrome (SIRA), leading patients to require intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU). A common complication of this ventilatory support is dysphagia, which has a prevalence of up to 30%.This work aims to describe rehabilitation methods in patients with coronavirus infection based on levels of evidence according to the GRADE System, so a systematic review of the literature was carried out. The selected articles were divided into the following subtopics: diagnosis of dysphagia and rehabilitation in COVID patients. The gold standard for the diagnosis of dysphagia is the videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFS). Fiberoptic Evaluation of Swallowing Assessment (FEES) has high sensitivity and specificity, although they have the disjunction of an aerosol-generating procedure (AGP);however, in a pandemic situation, the study of choice in the literature is VF. Once the diagnosis is made, it is necessary to initiate rehabilitation as soon as possible, even from hospitalization in patients who have hemodynamic stability to prevent long-term effects and promote normal swallowing even before discharge. In patients with COVID-19 infection dysphagia, the risk-benefit of assessment tools and therapy used for diagnosis should be decided to help to maintain social distancing. It becomes imperative to carry out clinical studies with high levels of evidence that allow us to generate Clinical Practice Guides for the benefit of our patients.Copyright © 2021 Sociedad Medica del Hospital General de Mexico. Published by Permanyer.

Relationship between acne and the use of mask in doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the characteristics of the use of masks and features of acne lesions and acne-like eruptions, among doctors involved in various clinical settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted from June to September 2020. The main tool of the study was a form designed with the Google forms platform, which has 17 items. RESULT(S): The responses of 150 participants from Mexico and Latin America were analyzed: 84 participants (56%) were female. The most frequent academic degree among the participants was Doctor of Medicine. The mask with the highest frequency of use was the N95 mask in 98 participants (65.3%);84% of the participants presented typical acne lesions, nodules were the most frequent lesions, only 24 patients did not present characteristic lesions. The topographic region where these lesions most frequently occurred was the chin region. CONCLUSION(S): The importance of the presence of acne and acne-like lesions in medical doctors who use personal protective equipment during their working hours is demonstrated, in order to issue future recommendations related to skin care during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.Copyright © 2022 Comunicaciones Cientificas Mexicanas S.A. de C.V.. All rights reserved.

Maskne: Its relationship to skin microbiome and response to treatment

Mask-wearing during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with an increased occurrence of a form of acne mechanica, popularly termed 'maskne. However, our understanding of this entity is limited. Hence we aimed to study the role of changes in the skin microbiome in mask induced acne and its response to standard acne treatment regimens. This was a prospective observational study. Adult patients having new-onset of lesions suggestive of acne within 6 weeks of regularly wearing mask or exacerbation of pre-existing acne were recruited. Disease severity was assessed using the 'Global Acne Severity Grading System (GAGS). Sample collection was done from pustules or comedones. Treatment was given according to American Academy of Dermatology Guidelines and follow up was done till 12 weeks. Data was entered and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) v.25. Total 50 patients were recruited in the study. 56% patients were female and 44% were male. 60% patients had a history of similar lesions in the past. 56% patients used surgical mask, 34 % used N-95 mask and 18 % used cloth mask. The average duration of use for mask per day was 6.78 +/- 2.65. Cheeks were the most commonly involved site and 62% of patients had mild GAGS. The severity of acne was significantly higher in patients using N-95 mask ( p<0.05) but not associated with duration of mask use, history of mask re-use and use of moisturizers. 70% cases did not require systemic treatment. KOH was negative in all cases. Gram stain showed gram positive cocci and rods in 22% and 14 % cases respectively. Aerobic culture showed Staphylococcus aureus growth in 30% cases and Anaerobic culture showed Cutibacterum acnes growth in 20% cases. In our study we found that maskne presented with a milder variant of acne which in majority of cases responded well to topical treatment standardized for acne vulgaris and had a microbiome profile similar to acne vulgaris.Copyright © 2023

Assessing Mask Integrity and Fit of N95 Masks after 5 Cycles of Decontamination and Reuse in a Simulated Clinical Setting

Aim: To evaluate the effect of decontamination and reuse on N95 masks. Background(s): The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has strained the global availability of masks. Such shortage represents a threat to healthcare workers (HCWs). Mask reprocessing and reuse may alleviate the shortage. Many laboratory studies have proven the effectiveness and feasibility of decontaminating N95 masks. However, very few had HCWs wearing them between cycles of decontamination. Our study evaluated mask integrity (assessed by qualitative mask fitting [QMF], as well as technical measures like bacterial filtration efficacy [BFE]) through five cycles of decontamination using four different modalities - steam, moist heat (MH), UV-C irradiation (UVCI), and hydrogen peroxide vaporization (HPV). Method(s): Each study cycle involved a HCW wearing a N95 mask for two hours, followed by the assigned decontamination process, and then a QMF. This was repeated for a maximum of 5 cycles, as long as the wearer passed QMF. 40 HCWs were recruited for each of the four decontamination modalities. The technical measures of mask integrity assessed were: BFE, Particulate Filtration Efficiency (PFE), Pressure Drop and Splash Resistance. Result(s): 60.6% (HPV) to 77.5% (MH) of the masks passed five cycles of wear and decontamination, as assessed by the wearers passing QMF all five times. MH-decontaminated masks retained all technical measures of integrity through all 5 cycles. HPV reduced masks' BFE after the fourth cycle while UVCI tended to increase the Pressure Drop. Conclusion(s): The results suggest that MH is a promising method for decontaminating N95 masks without compromising fit and integrity. [Figure presented] [Table presented]Copyright © 2023 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation.

Context of SARS-COV- 2 contamination of health care workers in a Tunisian academic hospital

Background: Since the emergence of SARS-CoV- 2 in China, health care workers have been identified as being at risk of contracting Covid-19. Objective(s): To describe the exposure situations of healthcare workers affected by SARS-CoV- 2. Method(s): A questionnaire was established and filled in by healthcare workers practicing at the Sahloul University Hospital of Sousse-Tunisia, who were diagnosed with COVID-19 during the period from September 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. Data were collected on activity, type of tasks performed, wearing of protective equipment, and existence of possible contacts with cases (professional or extra-professional), in the 2 weeks preceding the date of symptom onset. Result(s): A total of 188/287 infected healthcare workers responded to the questionnaire. The gender and age distribution of the respondents showed a sex ratio of 0.34 and an average age of 41 years. Paramedical staff represented 63% of the participants. Among the infected caregivers, 16 (8.5%) had not worked during the 15 days preceding the symptoms. There were 69 (36.7%) professionals who worked in the Covid sector. The rate of use of a FFP2 mask for the most risky tasks varied greatly according to the sector of practice. Concerning hydro-alcoholic solutions, 58.5% of the workers stated that they had them as often as necessary. Other exposure situations outside of direct patient care were reported by these infected workers: 20.4% reported at least one contact without a mask with one or more caregivers with a confirmed Covid-19 infection, and 32.4% reported contacts with suspected or confirmed cases of Covid-19 infection outside of their professional activity. Conclusion(s): The context of contamination of healthcare workers seems to be essentially professional. The nonuse of protective masks, particularly in non-COVID sectors, as well as the role of contamination between caregivers at their workplace seem to be important determinants of healthcare workers' contamination.

Allergic contact dermatitis to the elastic bands of an N95 mask

Case report Introduction: In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, occupational contact dermatitis related to the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) has become increasingly prevalent. While most cases are irritant in nature, allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) remains an important cause of occupational dermatitis. We report a case of ACD to rubber accelerators in the elastic bands of an N95 mask. Informed consent was obtained from the patient for this report. Case Report: A 27-year-old healthcare worker presented with a progressive pruritic eruption over her face and neck, 1 week after she began wearing N95 masks at work. She had only worn disposable surgical masks. She had no medical history apart from hand dermatitis, which was well controlled with topical medications. Examination revealed linear eczematous plaques along her lateral cheeks and posterior neck, corresponding to contact areas between the mask bands and her skin. Patch tests revealed a positive reaction to several rubber accelerators, including Thimerosal, 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT), and Methylisothiazolinone. We performed another patch test to several N95 mask straps, to which the patient developed an eczematous reaction to the elastic bands of 2 N95 mask types with elastic bands. Clarification with the manufacturer confirmed the use of rubber accelerators similar in properties to MBT in the production of these masks. A diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis to rubber accelerator was made. The patient's dermatitis resolved with topical corticosteroids and the avoidance of N95 masks with elastic bands. Discussion and Conclusion(s): The use of facial PPE such as masks is a recognised cause of occupational dermatitis among healthcare workers. A variety of dermatoses are associated with the use of facial PPE, with contact dermatitis being the most common. However, while the majority of contact dermatitis are irritant in nature, ACD remains an important and preventable cause of occupational dermatitis. Commonly implicated allergens associated with mask use include preservatives and adhesives used in their production, as well as metals in the nose clip. Although less common, mask elastic bands have also been reported to be a potential source of ACD, with rubber accelerators being identified as potential allergens. However, there is often a lack of declaration of such chemicals used in the production of PPE. Given the need for continued use in the occupational setting, early identification and avoidance of allergens are key. Failure to do so may result in the progression of skin lesions, ultimately affecting the patients' quality of life and work performance. With the ubiquitous use of masks in the current climate, we wish to highlight the need for greater awareness of rubber accelerators as potential allergens, and their presence in the elastic bands of frequently used PPE.

How Has COVID-19 Affected Orthopedic Surgeons and Residents in Chile? TT -?Como ha afectado el COVID-19 a traumatologos y residentes de traumatologia en Chile?.

Background Since March 2020, Chile has been affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which has caused disruptions throughout the world, greatly impacting health services and healthcare workers. Objective To describe the demographic characteristics related to the COVID-19 pandemic in orthopedic surgeons and orthopedic surgery residents in Chile. Methods We conducted an on-line survey requesting data on demographics, work, exposure to and infection by COVID-19, symptoms, and protection practices. Results A total of 567 surgeons answered the survey;37 (6.4%) had had COVID-19, without gender differences. Therewas a higher rate of infectionamong residents, 9 from73 (12.3%), than among surgeons, 28 from 494 (5.7%), as well as higher rates of infection among those working more than 60 hours (p<0.05). Among those infected, 31 (83.8%) were from the Metropolitan Region (MR), where the rate of infection was significantly higher compared with other regions (p< 0.05). Only 8 (21.6%) of those infected had medical history. Hospitalization was required by 3 (5.4%), 1 of them in the Intensive care Unit (ICU), and the remaining were handled at home. The most frequent location of infection was the workplace, with the common areas being the main suspected sites, followed by outpatient clinics and orthopedic surgery wards. In total, 40.5% (15) of the sample reported having infected other individuals. There was also an impact in the surgeon s income: 14.8% (84) reported a decrease lower than 20%, and 45% (256), a decrease higher than 50%. This decrease was higher among surgeons than among residents, and higher among those from the MR compared to other regions (p< 0.05). Conclusion Even though orthopedic surgery practice has been reduced by the pandemic, orthopedic surgeons have been exposed to the risk of infection by COVID-19. The workplace seems to be the site that poses the greatest risk, especially the common areas.Copyright © 2022 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.

Effects of face masks on cardiopulmonary performance in a partly double-blinded randomized cross-over study

Background: The use of face masks in the public and at work became mandatory as a result of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in many countries. Wearing masks under physical work or for a prolonged time may lead to complaints of labored breathing and increased stress. The influence of three types of masks on cardiopulmonary performance was investigated in a randomized cross-over design. Method(s): Forty volunteers (20 women, 19-65 years) underwent bodyplethysmography, spiroergometric and ergometric exercise tests without mask, with a surgical mask, a community mask and a FFP2 mask. Additionally, a 4hour mask wearing period was investigated during regular work (office or laboratory). Cardiopulmonary, physical, capnometric, and blood gas-related parameters were recorded. Result(s): Breathing resistance and work of breathing were increased when wearing a mask. During physical exercise minute ventilation was lower and the breathing cycle time was extended with mask. Wearing a mask caused minimal decreases in blood oxygen partial pressure (pO2) and oxygen saturation (sO2) and an initial slight rise in blood carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2) during exercise. All effects were most pronounced with FFP2. Temperature, humidity, and inspiratory CO2 concentration slightly increased behind the mask. No changes in pO2, sO2, and pCO2 were observed during the 4-hour wearing period at work. Conclusion(s): Wearing face masks at rest and under workload changed the breathing pattern in the sense of physiological compensation. Wearing a mask for 4 hours during light work had no effect on blood gases and no adverse effects were observed throughout all testing.

Health Care-Associated Infections: Best Practices for Prevention

Health care-associated infections (HAIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Common examples include catheter-associated urinary tract infections, central line-associated bloodstream infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, surgical site infections, and Clostridioides difficile infections. Standardized infection control processes and precautions have been shown to reduce the rate of HAIs, and targeted practices for HAIs have shown further reductions. Patient safety tools have been developed for various HAIs to help guide administrators and are free for public use through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention STRIVE (States Targeting Reduction in Infections via Engagement) initiative. The Choosing Wisely initiative makes best practice recommendations for physicians to improve quality of care and reduce costs;targeted recommendations were developed to reduce the risk of HAIs. For example, using invasive devices only when indicated and for the shortest time possible reduces the risk of device-related HAIs. The goal of antibiotic stewardship is to reduce C. difficile infections and further development of multidrug-resistant organisms such as vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Antibiotic stewardship targets physician behaviors such as reviewing antibiotic therapy choices every 48 to 72 hours, reviewing culture results as soon as available, de-escalating antibiotic therapy when appropriate, and documenting the indications for initiating and continuing antibiotic therapy.Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Family Physicians.

Head and neck cancer management in the Covid-19 era: Our experience

Introduction: In March 2020 a new viral pandemic was declared. As etiological factor a virus belonging to the coronavirus family was isolated. This virus was named SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19. This virus can cause different clinical frames, variating from mild symptomatology to cases of ARDS or death. Although the pandemic outbroke in China, COVID-19 had one of first hotspots in Italy, where the Public Health System needed a re-arrangement to face the disease. The incidence of oncological disease doesn't suffer any variation in relation to pandemics or emergency period, but need to be managed as soon as possible in every situation. In our maxillo-facial surgery Unit we continued our regular activities to treat all oncological patient that needed surgery during the pandemic. Because of the absence of knowledge about the COVID-19, first periods were very difficult to manage, due to the risk of infection of patients and health professionals. We decided to share our experience. Material(s) and Method(s): Between March and June 2020, 34 patients affected by head and neck cancer were admitted at our Unit. All patients underwent surgical treatment and were hospitalized until their situation guaranteed a safe discharge. Result(s): All patients treated for head and neck cancer underwent surgery. All the medical and nurse post-operative management was performed by health operators by using all the personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent any possible infection. All contacts between patients and their family were suspended. During phase 1, all patients were submitted to a short verbal triage, measurements of physiological parameters and qualitative COVID-19 test. They were also screened by imaging to guarantee there were not any bronchopulmonary diseases referable to viral infections. During phase 2, patients were also screened by serological tests. During phase 3, all patients practiced oropharyngeal swap before being hospitalized. Discussion(s): During lockdown a re-arrangement of the management of oncological patients was mandatory. The difficulties were caused by the restriction of several activities that guarantee a normal health care system function. To date there is not a standardized therapeutic protocol to face the infection. Main therapies are symptomatic and a lot of patients need to be treated in ICUs. To prevent any possible infections, surgical activities were reserved only for urgent disease that cannot be delayed. In our Unit we continued to manage oncological patients. Social distancing and confinement measures were necessary and mandatory, in order to manage our patients. During first phases we had not any valid instrument to totally exclude COVID-19 infection. During phase 3, when oropharyngeal swaps were introduced in the screening of our patients, we could start to work in a safer way. Conclusion(s): There are still a lot of difficulties in the management of patients during COVID 19 pandemic. Because of the important consequences deriving from the delay of oncological patients their management must to be clearly defined.Copyright © 2021